[ ]
Latest News Updates
By Unknown | Τρίτη 19 Φεβρουαρίου 2013 | Posted in , | With 0 comments

In an interesting conversation at the Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference yesterday, Microsoft’s CFO Peter Klein indicated that a Surface Mini might be waiting in the offing. There’s no indication of what size the Surface Mini might be, but it’s fairly safe to assume that it would be a 7-inch tablet that goes head-to-head against the Nexus 7, Kindle Fire, and iPad Mini.
Speaking at the Goldman Sachs conference, Klein hammered home the fact that Microsoft — at long last — is capable of extending the Windows (Metro) experience to almost every form factor. “The notion of flexibility and scalability of the operating system is intrinsic to our strategy,” he says. On smaller devices, Microsoft has Windows Phone 8, and for everything else there’s Windows 8, Windows Server 8 and Windows Embedded 8. With the same kernel in both WP8 and Windows 8, and app cross-compatibility, it is in theory quite easy for Microsoft to create an almost-seamless ecosystem that spans the gamut from 4- to 40-inch displays.
The question on my mind, though, is which operating system would power the Surface Mini. At seven or eight inches, the Surface Mini would find itself in an uncomfortable chasm between Microsoft’s two OSes. You see, despite having the same kernel and roughly the same Metro interface, Windows 8 and WP8 are rather different beasts. WP8 is designed almost exclusively for portrait use, while Windows 8′s Metro Start screen is only really usable in landscape orientation. Neither OS deals very well with repeated reorientation, which is exactly what most users do with 7-inch tablets (from reading, to gaming, to checking email, to watching a movie).
Inside the Surface Pro [Image credit: iFixit]This isn’t to say that Microsoft couldn’t tweak one of its OSes to work on a 7-inch device, though — and in all likelihood, I think Microsoft would choose Windows 8 or Windows RT for its Surface Mini. With better support for higher resolutions, media playback, and wireless connectivity, Windows 8 is a better choice. Windows Phone 8′s chief advantage is a lighter processor and memory footprint, which would increase battery life — but Windows RT, backed by the same ARM SoCs as WP8, has also proven itself of all-day battery life. WP8 also has more apps than Windows 8/RT, but many of them will need to be reworked for high-resolution displays and landscape orientation. (See: Windows 8 smartphones and Windows Phone 8 tablets.)
Ultimately, as Klein puts it, “We can have the same core code base driving form factors from four inches all the way up to 27-inch ones and everything in between, so I think we are well set up to respond to demand as we see it.” This isn’t quite a confirmation that the Surface Mini (or Surface Maxi?) is in development, but Amazon, Google, and Apple have all proven that the demand is obviously there. For what it’s worth, Microsoft has already signaled that the Surface RT and Pro tablets are just the beginning of a big foray into the world of consumer electronics. Let us not forget what Ballmer famously said in an interview with CRN back in July 2012, too: “We are not going to let annyyyyyyyyyyyyy piece of this [go uncontested to Apple]. Not the consumer cloud. Not hardware/software innovation. We are not leaving any of that to Apple by itself. Not going to happen! Not on our watch!”
Basically, a Surface Mini is guaranteed — it’s just a matter of when.
By Unknown | | Posted in | With 0 comments

Audi built a better automotive lighting system, known as the matrix beam LED headlamps. Matrix LEDs promise better, more precise lighting for the driver, less blinding light to dazzle oncoming cars, and a kind of mid-beams for roads with only a little traffic. The Matrix lighting technology is ready to go on the 2013 Audi A8 big luxury sedan, but don’t hold your breath if you live in the US — when Audi asked the National Highway Transportation Administration for a ruling, the NHTSA demurred, unsure how to fit the square peg of a variable-output, matrix headlamp array into the round hole they call low and high beams.
Never mind that Americans on average are getting older, their eyesight isn’t what it used to be, and they could use better automotive lighting. It’s more likely Audi’s innovation will show up first in Europe, which is more open to the field of intelligent lighting for cars. This is not an unproven or unsafe technology, rather it’s something the NHTSA needs to revisit, soon.
Matrix beams are just a start — the NHTSA needs to prepare itself for more new tech. Audi competitors BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Opel are working hard also on the field called smart lighting systems. BMW is even developing laser headlamps. No, not superheated beams arcing pinpricks of light and destruction designed to the zap VWs and Fiats that won’t get out of the passing lane (though we like the sentiment), but white lighting that can be precisely modulated and, unlike death rays, hardly uses any energy.
Audi’s matrix lighting, first shown on the Audi A2 concept car (photo below) at the 2011 Frankfurt Auto Show, comprises multiple segments that can be turned on or off as conditions warrant. Some elements could be steerable to help drivers go around corners. Combine it with next-generation GPS and the steerable lamp could swivel before you even begun to turn the wheel.
An accompanying multi-function camera watches for oncoming vehicles and has the smarts to tell them from all the lights strung along a used car lot. It also can (in the concept car at least) watch for pedestrians alongside the road. It daytime, it could also be the lane departure warning camera, possibly a forward collision warning camera if the car doesn’t have adaptive cruise control radar.

US historically sluggish to adopt lighting technology

Post-World War II and through the 1980s, Americans were stuck with sealed beam, tungsten-filament headlamps. Their options were one big 7-inch headlamp or two 5.25-inch sealed-beam headlamps on each side. European cars were more likely to have headlamps with lenses to project light along the road but not in the eyes of oncoming cars, replaceable quartz bulbs, and separate fog lamps. All Americans got was an approval for modest sealed-beam halogen units (a slight help in brightness) and rectangular headlamps (about the worst possible design, at the time, for efficient lighting).
The Department of Transportation (DOT) looked askance at projector headlamps molded to work with increasingly aerodynamic front ends, and both DOT and Consumer Reportschimed in that custom headlamps would be costlier to replace in a crash (true, and so are steering wheels with airbags) and you couldn’t find replacement units easily (true if you broke the entire unit in a crash, not true of the interchangeable bulb units). Over time, DOT came to see the value of brighter lighting systems and high-intensity discharge (HID) xenon lamp lighting. But it took time.
Audi A2 matrix LED headlamp
Audi A2 matrix LED headlamp

What if regulators aren’t as sharp as the industry they watch over?

Now the DOT through the NHTSA needs to address more new lighting technologies, such as matrix headlamps. It might have seen them coming if it absorbed the technical journals and paid attention at engineering conferences. It’s hard for government to compete for the best engineering, technical, and legal talent when there are no lofty salaries or stock options, only good medical plans.  It’s an issue in the patent and copyright offices, when aggressive companies get monopoly patent protection from so-so examiners on something the courts later decide was prior art. It’s an issue when DOT writes rules that say “no movies playing in the front seat” when really they should say “no movies playing in the front seat that the driver can see” because they didn’t know about the Sharp Dual View display that shows the driver one image and the passenger a second. So far only a handful of automakers have it, led by Mercedes-Benz with their SplitView system.
When government is uncertain about a new product or technology, it often chooses to move cautiously. That’s good if it’s a prescription acne drug that might cause cancer. With car lighting, the benefits (fewer accidents) probably outweigh the drawbacks. Eventually, Audi will get the headlamps approved. Just not at the speed of light.
By Unknown | | Posted in , | With 0 comments
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Etiam id libero non erat fermentum varius eget at elit. Suspendisse vel mattis diam. Ut sed dui in lectus hendrerit interdum nec ac neque. Praesent a metus eget augue lacinia accumsan ullamcorper sit amet tellus. Duis cursus egestas hendrerit. Fusce luctus risus id elit malesuada ac sagittis magna tempus. Sed egestas fringilla turpis at ullamcorper. Pellentesque adipiscing ornare cursus.

Ετικέτες